Untitled

His lies came easy. Effortless.
They slipped out of him like coins from a magician’s hand, practiced, casual, designed to distract from the real trick.

The first one was small enough to ignore, though something in me registered the off-ness.
He cancelled our very first date, saying he’d received devastating news about his father’s health. He sounded fragile, almost broken. I felt my compassion rise before I had time to think.

Much later, he admitted the truth.

He had been out drinking.
Got too drunk, lost his wallet, woke up hungover, and spun a story because it was easier than owning what actually happened.
And the story wasn’t random. It was crafted to tug at my tenderness; a sick father, a son in pain, a moment where he sounded like someone who needed gentle care.

It took me a long time to understand that he used emotion the way some people use tools: deliberately.

There were the sympathy lies—the ones meant to make me hold him close.
We were on a hike in the woods when he told me an ex-girlfriend of his had died in a car crash.
The forest was still, the filtered light soft, the air quiet in that way that makes sadness feel heavier. His voice dipped, his eyes glossed, and I held that story with reverence because grief deserves reverence.
And it was all fiction.
She was alive and well.

Then there were the identity lies—the ones meant to make him look like someone on the cusp of becoming the man he wanted me to believe he was.
He said he was only a few credits short of finishing his degree. Later I learned he’d gone for a semester or two and failed out.
He padded his online bio with half-truths, polishing abandoned projects into an illusion of momentum.
He said he wanted to be a writer.
But writing well requires telling the truth.
And he had spent his whole life avoiding his.

And finally, the most strategic category: the value lies—the ones designed to make me think we shared core beliefs.
He told me he first saw me at church.
He said it softly, reverently, like it mattered to him.
Faith mattered to me, so I believed him.

But he never went to church, except under pressure.
He was trying to get back into the good graces of his parents, not God.
That story was for me.
A tailored origin myth meant to make me feel like we were aligned in ways we never were.

By the time I realized how many of his stories didn’t hold up, I was already in deep.
And I should have ended it. Of course I should have.
But he had no money, no job, nowhere to go.
He had positioned his life so that leaving him would feel like abandoning someone in crisis.

And that was the architecture of the entire relationship:
fabricated wounds, embellished identities, and strategically placed helplessness—each one designed to tie me to him.

The irony is it wasn’t even him I was tied to.
It was who I believed I could become by saving him.

Looking back, I understand myself better.
I wasn’t foolish. I was hopeful. And hope can be its own kind of blindness.

Whenever anything required staying power, he didn’t have it.
Not for his projects.
Not for his growth.
Not for us.

I used to think it was his fragility that drew me in, but what really hooked me was the story I built around my own worth:

Look how much I give you.
Look how deeply I show up.
How could you ever leave someone who gives this much?

I wasn’t drawn to him. I was drawn to the identity I built around being the one who could fix him.

Every part of me knew I needed to end it, but the fear rose like a tide: What would that make me? Alone again. A failure again.

So I worked harder.
Gave more.
Poured myself into every crack he created.
Believing that if I sacrificed enough, the relationship would become what I hoped it was.

But in that process, I slowly erased myself.

When we finally ended, it wasn’t because I saw the truth.
It was because he left.

He married the first woman he dated after me.
The marriage didn’t last.
He contacted me while he was still married, telling me how things weren’t as good with her as they had been with me. How he missed us. How I had understood him in ways she never could.

After they separated, he tried to come back.

I had once prayed for him to return.
But when he finally did, he found a woman who no longer needed what she used to beg for.

I told him I could never trust him again.

Years later, when his marriage completely unraveled, he reached for me once more.

But by then, something essential had shifted.
I had already reclaimed the pieces of myself I once abandoned trying to save him.
And I understood something I hadn’t before:

I don’t need to be needed to be loved.
And I will never again rewrite myself to keep anyone.

SGW Reflection Frame

The Growth Point

This wasn’t just a breakup. It was a reclamation.
For years, I mistook being indispensable for being loved. I thought devotion was proven through endurance—through staying, through sacrificing, through holding together what someone else kept shattering.
Walking away wasn’t the hardest part.
The hardest part was admitting the truth:
I had been abandoning myself long before he ever left.

Why This Matters in SGW Terms

Second Generation Work names what this dynamic reveals:

• Subtle abandonment happens quietly.
  It shows up in the places where we disappear to keep someone else intact.

• The conditioned self confuses usefulness with worth.
  It builds identity around rescue, earning, and emotional labor.

• Old patterns don’t break with insight. Rather, they break with self-trust.
  Choosing differently is the lineage shift.

• This is the pivot point:
  When you stop trying to be chosen and start choosing yourself.

The Takeaway for Your Leadership & Life

• Notice where you overfunction in relationships, romantic or otherwise.

• Ask: Am I giving from truth, or from the fear of being left?

• Remember:
  Real connection doesn’t require you to shrink, stretch, or rewrite yourself.
  Love offered freely is never earned through sacrifice.